NASA Mars photo leaked – wood found on mars!

August 5, 2008
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (217 votes, average: 4.09 out of 5)

Someone at NASA released a photo that they shouldn’t have, a picture of a piece of timber the size of a railroad tie, a photo that could get someone killed. There is no mistaking that the object in the print below is a piece of wood. NASA claims that Mars is a desert planet with no life at all. NASA lies, repeatedly.

Where would a piece of timber this size come from? There are vast forests on Mars, ones that are kept from the public. This piece of wood looks like it floated to its present location, being partially sunk in the soil. The ground around it is very interesting. Notice the flat rock formation of the soil and the crevices in between them. Does this look familiar? It appears to be the bed of a dried up pond. There had to be a significant amount of water in this area, water high enough to lift that railroad tie sized piece of timber and float is perhaps several miles. The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter showed that vast regions of the Red Planet have been altered by floods. This dried pond effect should come as no surprise.

This flood had to have happened within the past thirty or forty years because the wood is intact, though this is judging the rate of decay by Earth standards. Some may say that Mars did have water on it long ago and that it even had an atmosphere, which is true, but a piece of timber isn’t going to survive for thousands of years.

Both of the Viking Orbiters filmed vast forests on Mars, though no subsequent probe to the Red Planet has shot a single frame of film showing a tree. This was by design. The Viking photographs show more than just a few trees but rather thousands upon thousand of them. These trees appear to be much larger than Earth trees, having a leaf and branch system that is unique to Mars. The foliage spans much wider than a similar plants on Earth do, rising to who knows what heights. The spacing between them could be the result of the dying Martian atmosphere. Dense forests more than likely filled large areas of Mars back in the days when it had a breathable environment. There were undoubtedly several species of trees, and different varieties of underbrush, which are now extinct.

The Flood destroyed the Garden of Eden and other ancient worlds that God wanted destroyed such as Atlantis. The Ancient Egyptians spoke of a time that existed before Egypt. The Sphinx clearly shows signs of water erosion, which shows that it existed before the Flood and well before modern archeologists claim that it did. The same wiping out strategy was applied to worlds beyond the Earth. Mars has an ancient world that was destroyed, one with a face and a pyramid. So it isn’t so hard to believe that the moon did as well.

Many claim that the moon isn’t a moon at all but an alien object that was placed in Earth orbit. Some have called it Luna. They claim that the moon was not mentioned in the Biblical story of creation, but it was. The moon was referred to as “the lesser light that rules the night” in Genesis 1:16. The moon stopped in the sky in Joshua 10:30 but this had nothing to do with the alien presence there.

The aliens live on the surface of the moon, but this is in no way saying that there isn’t an alien presence inside the moon as well. If you take some time to use your photo editor with high-resolution photos of the moon, it won’t take you long to find these structures. NASA will suggest that you created this or that it is really part of a crater. Stop and ask yourself one question, if the moon really is as NASA claims that it is, then why are some photos classified and unavailable to the public while others are inked and blurred?

One of the most famous examples of this is the Apollo 16 “Earth rise” photo in which “the Earth” is rising over the moon. NASA says that the object in the picture is the Earth and few people question it. If you think for yourself, and look with an open mind, you will clearly see that this is a UFO. This is another craft off to the left, which NASA doesn’t even attempt to explain away.

The fact that trees can survive in such an atmosphere, and with much less water than Earth trees do, reveals their unique structure while offering hope for an increasingly polluted Earth. Since the Martian atmosphere is 95% carbon dioxide, these plants would have to thrive on it in a way much superior to Earth trees. They may give off oxygen, though I am using terrestrial vegetation for comparison, but they could give off another gas, one even toxic to humans. Seeding or drafting these trees in bulk could bring breathable air back to the Red Planet. If Mars was so altered by water, then where did all that water go? Some of it went into the soil, much of it is frozen at the poles, and a good percentage of it went into a lake. NASA didn’t need to spend all that money on the Phoenix Mission in order to search for water on Mars. All they had to do was look at their old photographs.

The only way that piece of timber got to where it was is by way of flood, and the only way that it separated from the tree that it was once a part of was by high and rapidly flowing water. Based on the findings of the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, that piece of wood could’ve floated for some distance before coming to its final resting place.

The lake, although frozen, Mars having a mean surface temperature of -46 degrees C, must contain more than just water. There has to be some amebas and other single celled organisms in these waters. There are most likely fossils of Martian fish and perhaps even Martian animals. On Earth, old lake beds are a prime location in which to find dinosaur fossils. Why would Mars be any different?

If you examine the lake carefully, especially toward the right angle, you will notice two indentations. One is large and shallow while the other one, which is located near the right edge of the lake, is small but much deeper. These are due to the lake shifting as the result of temperature fluctuations.

NASA can keep telling its lies but the photos have slipped out and what a story they tell. NASA thought that the Opportunity Rover took a picture of the area in front of it, but did they honestly expect us to forget about the railroad sized piece of timber in the foreground? It’s time for NASA to come clean with the public. It’s time that they land one of those rovers in Cydonia, the Inca city, or in one of forests.

Image sources:

The high resolution picture, which this might have come from is at:

The object is on the left hand side of the montage.

More photos:

Navigation Camera :: Sol 115 (27 images) – Text Only version

It can be seen in Navigation Photo Sol 118

Tom Arbino has his own UFO forum:



26 Responses to “NASA Mars photo leaked – wood found on mars!”

  1. GS on November 28th, 2008 3:14 pm

    I agree it is intriguingly “timber” like in appearance. It also looks like rock, albeit interestingly weathered and solitary.

  2. Bruno on November 28th, 2008 4:47 pm

    Not only does that look like a piece of wood, it looks like a piece of _cut_ wood!

  3. Thorleyart on November 28th, 2008 8:07 pm

    ”Someone at NASA released a photo that they shouldn’t have, a picture of a piece of timber the size of a railroad tie, a photo that could get someone killed”

    Really, so why is the photo on NASA’s website?

  4. Valero on November 29th, 2008 4:28 am

    Thats not a log….its one of those flat rocks tilted into the ground. What looks like wood is the layering rock itself.

  5. HealingMindN on November 29th, 2008 9:10 pm

    OK, it’s obvious that’s a piece of milled wood, but could someone please have a look at and tell me what that shiny object is in the upper right hand corner? I see it in other pictures and it seems to change shape.

    Thanks in advance

  6. robrecord on November 30th, 2008 8:51 pm

    The ground is made up of flat blocks, probably cracked surface rock from the time the crater was formed. This ‘wood’ is just a peice of rock turned on it’s side. You can see more of them further in the distance nearer the crater edge.

    You jump to many conclusions, and your references to god are based on no fact.

    What is interesting is those ‘forests’ – I would be eager to find out more about those.

  7. older than dirt on December 1st, 2008 1:04 am

    If true, WOW !!!! but shaped like a RR tie? How?

  8. alex2468 on December 2nd, 2008 12:48 am

    i see that the source for the pictures of the wood is the nasa website, but what is the source of the picture of the forest and of the lake? is that from nasa as well? i would like to know, please help.

  9. chill197 on December 2nd, 2008 9:26 pm

    It’s a rock a piece of flat, platy, layered sulfur-rich outcrop rock to be more precise there on nearly all the photos

  10. pinaylover on December 4th, 2008 9:32 am

    What makes this picture even more interesting is that the piece of wood is not round in shape but appears to be rectangular. Trees that are caught in floods always land in the water intact with their roots intact.

    If it is indeed rectangular in shape, then that would mean that this piece of wood was cut and shaped and is not natural. By NASA releasing this, if it turns out to be genuine, not only do they show the world that plants existed on Mars, but also intelligent life.

  11. rockhound on December 9th, 2008 6:10 pm

    If it’s wood, I’d expect it to be petrified, potentially very ancient, and not going to float on water. I’ve often found petrified wood in rectangular shapes, as if cut. [No, they weren’t]
    Also possibly uncovered by the apparent meteor impact, if that’s a large crater.
    I wonder if the bright object is part of the spacecraft?

    The forests resemble manganese dendrites, but orders of magnitude larger than those on Earth, …still makes me wonder if they’re more mineral than organic.
    The population distribution over the terrain is governed by the same laws, either way.


  12. PasserBy on December 26th, 2008 8:01 pm

    I’m sorry, but this is obviously the edge of a slab of rock that has been turned over on its side by the impact that created the crater to the right of the picture. It is also quite evident that NASA has made no attempt to hide this image either, so there is no reason for anyone to have “leaked” it.

    I agree with a previous poster, however, that there is an interesting, apparantly shiny, object in the background of the picture which looks even more anomolous compared to the general terrain. Chances are, however, that there could be a mundane explanation for it also.

  13. Piece of wood on Mars? - Mario’s Blog on December 26th, 2008 10:25 pm

    […] What do you think? To me, it just looks like a rocky formation. More details here. […]

  14. omega_files on December 26th, 2008 11:56 pm

    Look behind the log at the tire marks from the truck that dumped the log there! Look at the boot print at the bottom right! The boot print and the tire marks are from the guy who went up there with a bottle of Windex to clean the camera lens and to change the batteries on the rover. They went to the moon in the 50’s and they went to Mars in the 60’s. Otis T Carr had a craft that could go there in 1955. They already went to the edge of the Galaxy and back a long time ago before we were all born.
    Time to wake up people! They have been lying to you about everything since before you were born… since when do they ever tell you the truth???.. It’s all been lies and it always has been. There are others on EVERY PLANET.

  15. omega_files on December 27th, 2008 12:17 am

    There is also a huge frozen lake at the upper left and it is extending to the right behind the crater. The tire tracks are along the beach at the edge of the frozen water.
    There is also a smudged airbrushed area at middle right. The color of the image also looks altered towards the Grey.. they are not showing true color… you would figure with all the technology available today that they would give you a true color image… I can get a better picture than that if I had a Nikon. If they gave you the true color you would see that it should look no different than a picture taken here on earth…. but it doesn’ looks altered Grey with wrong colors. Who are they trying to fool? How dumb do they think we are?

  16. omega_files on December 27th, 2008 12:44 am

    I can also see the word H20 written in the dirt above the footprint. It must have been written by the guy who went up there to clean the rover. But it could have been any of the locals living there too.

  17. omega_files on December 27th, 2008 1:08 am

    wait a minute… Look above the logs to the left of the tire tracks..I can see waves on the water…that lake is not frozen! This image is color altered to prevent you from seeing the lake and the waves on it.

  18. mscir on December 27th, 2008 4:19 am

    While I love the alternative to mainstream news that sites like this offer, I think it only hurts them to make extremely unrealistic claims such as this article title. Anyone who knows anything about how harsh the Martian environment is knows that wood wouldn’t last long on Mars, and without a forest nearby, finding anything but petrified wood on Mars, and very old petrified wood at that, would be nothing short of a miracle. Obviously weathered rock is the most likely explanation, so claiming it is wood without a question mark in the title is simply stupid. This site should work a little harder to make sense or reasonable, open-minded people who are looking for non-kook non-mainstream news will go away.

  19. DesertMan on December 27th, 2008 7:29 am

    The timber does have flat sides that can clearly be seen. What you are missing is also the ends. They are clearly at 90 degree angles to the sides. “…end of an up turned rock?”..not likely. Additionally, you all seem to be missing what is on the ground next to “The Timber” It appears to be a stack of partially buried material having edges at right angles and pushed toward the timber to reveal their uniform thickness. The drainage has been from the 9:30 to 3:30 direction from the timber, across the top of the stack and down the incline, stairstep side, pooling at the bottom.

    “Coffey looks and he sees Russians. You’ve got to look with better eyes.”

  20. cocky_mizel on December 27th, 2008 3:25 pm

    Go check out J.P. Skipper’s Mars Anomaly Research Page, definitely the best website on this subject, lots of pics and commentary.

  21. Kiss on December 28th, 2008 2:54 am

    Sorry folks…that looks like some sort of hole in the ground. See the sun off the upper left part? See? The lighter shade reflects off the back of it. It is an optical illusion.

  22. Kiss on December 28th, 2008 2:55 am

    oh I am talking about the alleged piece of wood which is the optical illusion. Be careful with all the OI’s in the pics of mars. :o)

  23. tinFoiler on December 28th, 2008 3:46 am

    this railroad tie thing is all good and well but look above it and zoom way in. that shiny white spot there is a deletion. easy to tell it’s been tampered with under high zoom. the rest of the pic looks one way and then right there it is very different.

  24. tinFoiler on December 28th, 2008 3:50 am

    you can get the best look at what i’m talking about in second link under more photos

  25. PBman on January 3rd, 2009 7:26 pm

    Actually, it’s an old picture. It’s from a press conference in 2001:

  26. qtip on January 14th, 2009 4:45 pm

    In Arizona there is a park called the Petrified Forest National Park The wood is solid rock, but has the look of wood – because at one time it was wood. Fossils of entire forest that look the exact same way this one does. It is possible, so there may be more evidence under the sand.

Got something to say?